CALIFORNIA'S BOLD NEW DATA PRIVACY LAW: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TO COMPLY
Posted by Anne Kelley on Sep 14th 2018
2018 has been a pivotal year for consumer data protection, with sweeping new laws
being passed to ensure increased consumer data privacy around the world. In May,
Europe’s General Data Protection Law, or GDPR, took effect. In June, the California
Legislature passed the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”), a bold new
digital data privacy law that is the first of its kind in the United States. The California
law becomes effective on January 1, 2020, and will launch a new era of d
Read more
Murchison & Cumming Prevails at California Supreme Court
Posted by Murchison & Cumming LLP on Sep 12th 2018
On August 23, 2018 the California Supreme Court issued a far-reaching decision in the case of King v. CompPartners, Inc. (S232197) which positively impacts the workers' compensation system and represents a significant victory for the utilization review industry and the physicians with whom they work. The Riverside County Superior Court sustained a demurrer, without leave to amend, on behalf of defendants, a utilization review company and a utilization review physician, to a complaint filed by an
Read more
There Are No Small Conflicts: Due to Undisclosed, Known Conflict, Supreme Court Agrees that Engagement Agreement Is Unenforceable but Keeps Door Open to Law Firm Receiving Compensation Under Equitable Principles
Posted by Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP on Sep 12th 2018
In Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP v. J-M Manufacturing Co., Inc. (8/30/2018 No. S232946), the California Supreme Court held that the conflict of interest of the law firm (“Sheppard Mullin”) rendered its engagement agreement, including an arbitration provision, with its client (“J-M”) unenforceable because the agreement violated the California Rules of Professional Conduct (“RPC”). Although the agreement included an “advance” conflict waiver, the Court deemed it ineffective because She
Read more
Accident/Occurrence Requirement Does not Preclude Coverage for Vicarious Liability or Negligent Supervision
Posted by Law Firm of Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP on Aug 12th 2018
In Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Ledesma & Meyer Construction Co., Inc. (No. S236765, filed 6/4/18) (L&M), the California Supreme Court ruled that the liability insurance requirement that injury be caused by an “occurrence,” defined as an “accident,” does not preclude coverage of an employer’s independent tort liability for injury deliberately caused by its employee.In L&M, Liberty insured a construction company that contracted to manage a construction project at a middle school in S
Read more