Insurance Policy’s Promise to Advance Claims Expense for Covered Claims Does Not Create a Duty to Defend
Posted by Christopher Kendrick- Haight on Jul 29th 2019
In United Farm Workers of America v. Hudson Insurance Company, (E.D. Cal.) 2019 WL 1517568, the United Farm Workers of America union (UFW) sued Hudson Insurance Company for breach of contract and bad faith arising out of a former employee’s wrongful termination and wage and hour lawsuit.Hudson provided UFW with Labor Professional Liability Insurance that included employment practices liability coverage. Hudson reserved its rights and agreed to pay an allocated share of the defense costs, citing
Read more
Georgia Supreme Court Hands Major Victory to Insurance Companies in Bad Faith Failure to Settle Cases
Posted by Rob Cruser on Jul 29th 2019
In a game-changing decision, the Georgia Supreme Court eliminated bad-faith failure to settle cases absent a "valid offer" from the injured party. In First Acceptance, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled as follows:"We also asked the parties to address whether an insurer's duty to settle arises only when the injured party presents a valid offer to settle within the insured's policy limits or whether, even absent such an offer, a duty arises when the insurer knows or reasonably should know that settl
Read more
Florida Court Holds Insurer Lacks Standing to Sue Defense Counsel for Legal Malpractice
Posted by Lawyers for the Profession on Jul 29th 2019
March 1, 2019Lawyers for the Profession®Arch Ins. Co. v. Kubicki Draper, LLP, 2019 Fla. App. LEXIS 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2019)Brief SummaryThe Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal held that an insurer does not have standing to sue defense counsel for legal malpractice in connection with representation of an insured in an underlying matter, because defense counsel and the insurer are not in privity. Specifically, the Court concluded that the insurer is not an intended third-party b
Read more
Code of Civil Procedure Section 998 Penalties Apply to Insurer that Defends Action in Name of Insured’s Estate Under Probate Code Section 550
Posted by Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP on Mar 5th 2019
In Meleski v. Estate of Hotlen (No. C080023, filed 11/29/18), a California appeals court held that an insurer is subject to the penalties for failure to accept a statutory offer to compromise under Code of Civil Procedure 998, even though the estate of its deceased insured is the named defendant in an action that the insurer defends under Probate Code sections 550, et seq.In Meleski, the insured was at fault in an accident, but died before suit was filed. The complaint named his estate, although
Read more
Insurer Prohibited from Bringing Separate Contribution Action in Subrogation to Rights of Suspended Insured
Posted by Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP on Mar 5th 2019
December 4, 2018In Travelers Property Casualty Co. of Amer. v. Engel Insulation, Inc. (No. C085753, filed 11/30/18), a California appeals court held that an insurer may not file its own action to assert claims solely as a subrogee of a suspended corporation, where the corporation could not otherwise assert the claims on its own behalf.In Engel, a homeowners association filed a construction defect action against the developer, Westlake. Travelers defended Westlake as an additional insured on the
Read more