Genuine Dispute Over Workers' Compensation Reduction From Uninsured Motorist Benefits Negates Bad Faith
Posted by Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP on Mar 5th 2019
December 20th, 2018 In Case v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Inc. (No. B281732, filed 11/21/18, ord. pub. 12/18/18), a California appeals court held that the allowable reduction from uninsured motorist (UM) benefits for “payable” workers’ compensation benefits meant “eligible,” whether the insured sought the benefits or not. As a result, the court found that a genuine dispute over resolution of the insured’s workers’ compensation claim negated a claim for bad faith delay in payment
Read more
The New Jersey Supreme Court Limits Offer of Judgment Sanctions in Multi-defendant Cases
Posted by Brian C Harris on Sep 14th 2018
In the matter of Willner v. Vertical Reality, the New Jersey Supreme Court set limits on a plaintiff’s ability
to win sanctions under the Offer of Judgment Rule in cases of multiple defendants, even when the
ultimate damages award is well beyond the original judgment. The Court overturned an award of
sanctions in a product liability case where a jury ordered two defendants to pay plaintiff far beyond
what his attorney had demanded in a pretrial offer of judgment. The Supreme Court said it wo
Read more
Court to Revisit Decision Against Fiduciary Rule
Posted by By Elizabeth Dilts on Apr 27th 2018
Attorneys general from California, Oregon and New York on Thursday filed a motion to intervene in a case between the securities industry and the U.S. Department of Labor, petitioning the full 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to revisit its earlier decision on a rule governing investment advice for retirees.The court, in a 2-1 decision in March, found in favor of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Securities Industry Financial Markets Association and others that argued that the DOL’s fiduciary ru
Read more